An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
This is from the whichversion discussion, I think it is an interesting case. I can't for the life of me see how a KJVist can defend the KJV on this rendering...----------Here's another case where the...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
You wrote: I appreciate all your point's (always), but here we have it on the authority of the author of Hebrews.Assuming you mean Genesis 47.31 should have been translated "staff" INSTEAD of "bed",...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
I understand the possibility you are wondering about, and I assure you all I did not mean anything by it. Since I speak Spanish as a second language, and thereby have studied Latin roots, I never...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
... and if we are talking about which of us embarrass Christ, well, you should walk softly.
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
No doubt there are reasons for you not to respect me as well. In fact, the Lord's criticism was not often aimed at the openly incorrect or unworthy, but quite often aimed at the "correct" and...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
apprec the clarification. i'm not an expert in Spanish, but "leche" means "inconvenient" in Malay, as in "tak kereta sungguh leche lah!" (without a car [life] is very inconvenient).Joseph Ng"For ever,...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
Quote:I don't consider Ruckman my pastor either, but I do read his writings, and I try to find his point, not what I can use against him. I don't know what any of you folks' criticism of Ruckman has...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
Quote:... and if we are talking about which of us embarrass Christ, well, you should walk softly. Shouldn't we all?
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
You wrote: But he, and you, are very wrong about whether or not I submit to any Bible that exists. Just because I use a number of translations does not mean that I do not submit to God's word.Did you...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
Quote:Did you notice your subtle change in my words? What change do you mean? Because I said I submit to God's word, rather than saying "Bible that exists"? The Bible IS God's word, is it not? Would I...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
Quote:So IF you do SUBMIT to a BIBLE that EXISTS, tell me which one it is, define it clearly, a Bible you do not correct, and do not allow others to correct for you. "You cry out that it is a crime to...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
Mitex is hinting that he believes Ruckman's theory that the LXX did not exist prior to Origen inventing it and passing off his own Greek Old Testament as an ancient version.Is this the case? Will the...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
Martin Luther and John Wesley are not to the point. Ruckman's attitudes and actions that disqualify Ruckman from being a minister of the Word are.Take care,ScottGutless and Spineless Person #3Whiny...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
Quote:Remember, even most of the Jews back then didn't understand Hebrew, they had to repeat everything again in Aramaic in the Synagoges. However most people in the empire were familiar with...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
If Ruckman is disqualified as a "minister of the word" then so were Luther AND Wesley. That none of them are the point is THE POINT that I was making. Their lives, their failures, their sins, do not...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
If Ruckman is disqualified as a "minister of the word" then so were Luther AND Wesley.We weren't discussing Luther and Wesley, so bringing up their names is nothing but a change of subject, unless you...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
Quote:If they didn't speak Hebrew (very few) then why is Hebrew showing up time and time again in the Scriptures with people SPEAKING and UNDERSTANDING it?Time and again? The word translated "Hebrew"...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
As was pointed out, "Hebrew" in the NT doesn't mean the Hebrew of the OT, it just means the common language of the Hebrew people (Aramaic).Concerning the Synagogue in the first century..."After each...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
Look, Scott, I am not defending Ruckman's faults. And the point I made is legitimate and relevant to what we were discussing. I respect Wesley and Luther in spite of some hateful and wicked...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
The word Hebrew actually occurs 10 times in the NT, and refers to the spoken language of Judea and Samaria. Also, the "interpretations" in the Gospels, Acts, Revelations, and references in the...
View ArticleRe: An interesting KJV error where the NIV is correct?
Quote:The word Hebrew actually occurs 10 times in the NT, and refers to the spoken language of Judea and Samaria. Yes, if you read my whole post, you would have noticed that I did correct that later...
View Article
